I am leavng this site, due to lack of moderation to uphold the site policy, governing behavior which are stated in the about section of the menu as follows:
a. is unlawful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, libelous, deceptive, fraudulent, invasive of anotherÂ’s privacy, tortious, contains explicit or graphic descriptions or accounts of sexual acts (including but not limited to sexual language of a violent or threatening nature directed at another individual or group of individuals), or otherwise violates our rules or policies;
b. victimizes, harasses, degrades, or intimidates an individual or group of individuals on the basis of religion, gender, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, age, or disability;
c. infringes on any patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright, right of publicity, or other proprietary right of any party;
d. constitutes unauthorized or unsolicited advertising, junk or bulk email (also known as "spamming"), chain letters, any other form of unauthorized solicitation, or any form of lottery or gambling;
e. contains software viruses or any other computer code, files, or programs that are designed or intended to disrupt, damage, or limit the functioning of any software, hardware, or telecommunications equipment or to damage or obtain unauthorized access to any data or other information of any third party; or
f. impersonates any person or entity, including any of our employees or representatives
Therefore, please remove this account and if able all content posted from the id Stu.
The above post should be removed and is offensive, berating, of topic to the context of the forum and also belittling. I reckon that all users should not encourage this, and all mods should remove posts such as this asap, and so people do not get harrased, bullied and trashed by jerks such as this (previous) anonymous poster. Any post that targets someone with an off topic thread should be treated as spam and trolling, whether a member or not. Yes perhaps mine was also, perhaps the above post is a rebutle, but it is definately targeting and berating a member which mine was not doing. And I do not know where else to pass suggestions on to to pass on feedback.
I see, however the 1 ohm resistor is not in the loop with the i2=21/4. Also, the 1 ohm resistor is in parallel with the 1 ohm resistor. So I still don't understand according to the logic explained.
Additionally, the current is flowwing (ccw), would it be correct to say this is not for conventional current? Does this also work for the conventional current, would the dirrection or anything else need to be changed?
In the second figure below, how was 11.2v found? Can I solve it through P.D and which values? What about how I would do it through Kirchhoff's current theorem? I tried the latter and got a error. Additionally, what step was taken to get the 2 ohm as a load, as well why or what is load defined as ( i mean with respect to theorems and what not- how is it used? Thanks.
Why was 10 in the divide both sides by 10 step chosen?
I didn't understand this step. Please explain it- I looked at t for 5 minutes. Maybe I should look longer?
Multiply (3) by 4 and (4) by 5
4 = 20*I1 - 16*I2 ...(5)
-10 = -20*I1 + 30*I2 ...(6)
does this work for all silmultaneous equatoins, only those with 2 unknowns or only where one unknown will cancle? If it works for all i am very grateful. $_$.
For the above post, using the matrix (mesh theorem) I have to do it like a matrix? or can i just do a vector cross product of the top line, then the bootm line, and please give an example if yes. How do I solve this 3 unknowns by not using simultaneous and perhaps by using Thevenins theorem instead?