All x's that count for 5/(x-2) < 3/(x-4) ?
Cross-multiplying, we have
5(x-4) < 3(x-2) simplify
5x - 20 < 3x - 6 subtract 3x from both sides and add 20 to both sides
2x < 14 divide by 2 on both sides
x < 7
But we have to be careful with this answer......x cannot be equal to either 2 or 4 because it would make the denominator(s) in the original problem undefined.....also, when x < 2 or when 4 < x < 7 the original inequality is true, but it is not true when 2< x < 4
So, our answer is
(-∞, 2) U (4, 7)
All x's that count for 5/(x-2) < 3/(x-4) ?
Cross-multiplying, we have
5(x-4) < 3(x-2) simplify
5x - 20 < 3x - 6 subtract 3x from both sides and add 20 to both sides
2x < 14 divide by 2 on both sides
x < 7
But we have to be careful with this answer......x cannot be equal to either 2 or 4 because it would make the denominator(s) in the original problem undefined.....also, when x < 2 or when 4 < x < 7 the original inequality is true, but it is not true when 2< x < 4
So, our answer is
(-∞, 2) U (4, 7)
5x−2<3x−4(x−2)2(x−4)25x−2<(x−2)2(x−4)23x−45(x−2)(x−4)2<3(x−2)2(x−4)5(x−2)(x2−8x+16)<3(x2−4x+4)(x−4)5(x3−8x2+16x−2x2+16x−32)<3(x3−4x2+4x−4x2+16x−16)5(x3−10x2+32x−32)<3(x3−8x2+20x−16)5x3−50x2+160x−160<3x3−24x2+60x−482x3−26x2+100x−112<0x3−13x2+50x−56<0
Look for roots using factor theorum. Any integer factors must be factors of 56
try±1±1−13±50−56 No they are going to be put together to get 0
try±2±8−52±100−56=±8±100−52−56=±108−108 Great +2 is a factor.
Doing the polynomial division and struggling considerably with latex I get:
\begin{tabular}{cccccc} &&\;x^2&-11&+28& &&&||&||&||&||& x&-2&\|\;x^3&-13x^2&+50x&-56\\ &&\;x^3&-2x^2&&& &&||&||&||&||& &&&-11x^2&+50x&-56&\\ &&&-11x^2&+22x&& &&&||&||&||& &&&&+28x&-56&\\ &&&&+28x&-56& &&&&||&||& &&&&&0& \end{tabular}
SO Now I have
x3−13x2+50x−56<0(x−2)(x2−11x+28)<0(x−2)(x−4)(x−7)<0
I would have drawn this freehand if I was not doing it for forum reproduction.
It can be seen from the graph that x
Otherwise stated as (−∞,2)∪(4,7)
I'm not saying that this was the easiest or the best way but surely you have to be impressed!
I HAVE AN EXCELLENT GIFT FOR DOING THINGS THE LONG WAY ! IT IS A GOD GIVEN GIFT!!
Melody you seriously are gifted , i would go crazy writing that much and not only writing but reading aswell!And yes my head is really spinning after seeing your anwer!btw even i have got a unique gift!anyways what gift is yours CPhill!
What is your gift Rosala?
Surely that is worth your 3 points Chris - even just for head hurting value.
That Latex division took me for ever, I even had to "invent" some of it ! LOL
Melosy i'll tell you that some time esle! a long story!
melody your an expert in LaTex i wish i could even be!
Notice one thing more about this one , if we want to use Melody's algebraic method....taking it from here
5(x-2)(x-4)2 < 3(x-2)2(x-4)
We can do this to simplify things.....
5(x-2)(x-4)2 - 3(x-2)2(x-4) < 0 factoring, we have
(x-2)(x-4)[5(x-4) - 3(x-2)] < 0
(x-2)(x-4)[5x- 20 -3x +6 ] < 0
(x-2)(x-2)[2x -14] < 0
2(x-2)(x-4)(x-7) < 0
(x-2)(x-4)(x-7) < 0
And notice that we don't have to use the Factor Theorem at all....the "roots" (i.e., critical interval values) are right in front of us !!!