Processing math: 100%
 
+0  
 
+3
1214
12
avatar

All x's that count for 5/(x-2) < 3/(x-4) ?

 Sep 14, 2014

Best Answer 

 #1
avatar+130477 
+13

All x's that count for 5/(x-2) < 3/(x-4) ?

Cross-multiplying, we have

5(x-4) < 3(x-2)     simplify

5x - 20 < 3x - 6     subtract 3x from both sides and add 20 to both sides

2x < 14                 divide by 2  on  both sides

x < 7

But we have to be careful with this answer......x cannot be equal to either 2  or 4  because it would make the denominator(s) in the original problem undefined.....also, when x < 2 or when  4 < x < 7 the original inequality is true, but it is not true when 2< x < 4

So, our answer is

(-∞, 2) U (4, 7)

 

 Sep 14, 2014
 #1
avatar+130477 
+13
Best Answer

All x's that count for 5/(x-2) < 3/(x-4) ?

Cross-multiplying, we have

5(x-4) < 3(x-2)     simplify

5x - 20 < 3x - 6     subtract 3x from both sides and add 20 to both sides

2x < 14                 divide by 2  on  both sides

x < 7

But we have to be careful with this answer......x cannot be equal to either 2  or 4  because it would make the denominator(s) in the original problem undefined.....also, when x < 2 or when  4 < x < 7 the original inequality is true, but it is not true when 2< x < 4

So, our answer is

(-∞, 2) U (4, 7)

 

CPhill Sep 14, 2014
 #2
avatar+118703 
+11

5x2<3x4(x2)2(x4)25x2<(x2)2(x4)23x45(x2)(x4)2<3(x2)2(x4)5(x2)(x28x+16)<3(x24x+4)(x4)5(x38x2+16x2x2+16x32)<3(x34x2+4x4x2+16x16)5(x310x2+32x32)<3(x38x2+20x16)5x350x2+160x160<3x324x2+60x482x326x2+100x112<0x313x2+50x56<0

 

Look for roots using factor theorum.  Any integer factors must be factors of 56

try±1±113±5056      No they are going to be put together to get 0

try±2±852±10056=±8±1005256=±108108      Great +2 is a factor.

 

Doing the polynomial division and struggling considerably with latex I get:

\begin{tabular}{cccccc} &&\;x^2&-11&+28& &&&||&||&||&||& x&-2&\|\;x^3&-13x^2&+50x&-56\\ &&\;x^3&-2x^2&&& &&||&||&||&||& &&&-11x^2&+50x&-56&\\ &&&-11x^2&+22x&& &&&||&||&||& &&&&+28x&-56&\\ &&&&+28x&-56& &&&&||&||& &&&&&0& \end{tabular}

 

SO Now I have

x313x2+50x56<0(x2)(x211x+28)<0(x2)(x4)(x7)<0

 

 

I would have drawn this freehand if I was not doing it for forum reproduction.

 

It can be seen from the graph that  x

 

Otherwise stated as          (,2)(4,7)

 

I'm not saying that this was the easiest or the best way but surely you have to be impressed!

 

I HAVE AN EXCELLENT GIFT FOR DOING THINGS THE LONG WAY !  IT IS A GOD GIVEN GIFT!!

 

 Sep 15, 2014
 #3
avatar+130477 
+3

As rosala would say......."You just made my head hurt, Melody."

(LOL).......

 

 Sep 15, 2014
 #4
avatar+118703 
+3

I didn't have to 'check' my answer!   LOL

 Sep 15, 2014
 #5
avatar+11912 
+3

Melody you seriously are gifted , i would go crazy writing that much and not only writing but reading aswell!And yes my head is really spinning after seeing your anwer!btw even i have got a unique gift!anyways what gift is yours CPhill!

 Sep 15, 2014
 #6
avatar+118703 
+3

What is your gift Rosala?

Surely that is worth your 3 points Chris - even just for head hurting value.

That Latex division took me for ever, I even had to "invent" some of it !    LOL

 Sep 15, 2014
 #7
avatar+11912 
+3

Melosy i'll tell you that some time esle! a long story!

 

melody your an expert in LaTex i wish i could even be!

 Sep 15, 2014
 #8
avatar+130477 
+8

Notice one thing more about this one , if we want to use Melody's algebraic method....taking it from here

5(x-2)(x-4)2 < 3(x-2)2(x-4)

We can do this to simplify things.....

5(x-2)(x-4)2 - 3(x-2)2(x-4) < 0      factoring, we have

(x-2)(x-4)[5(x-4) - 3(x-2)] < 0

(x-2)(x-4)[5x- 20 -3x +6 ] < 0

(x-2)(x-2)[2x -14] < 0

2(x-2)(x-4)(x-7) < 0

(x-2)(x-4)(x-7) < 0

And notice that we don't have to use the Factor Theorem at all....the "roots" (i.e., critical interval values) are right in front of us !!!

 

 Sep 16, 2014
 #9
avatar+118703 
+3

What a show off!  Anyway,  my gift is to do things the   L  O  N  G     w  a  y    

 Sep 16, 2014
 #10
avatar+130477 
+3

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(Ain't  I crafty ????????)

 

 Sep 16, 2014
 #11
avatar+118703 
+3

Yes you are very crafty!

 Sep 18, 2014
 #12
avatar+118703 
+3

Hi Heureka

I was showing off my latex for the algebraic division and I wondered if you could improve upon it?

 Sep 18, 2014

0 Online Users