Processing math: 100%
 

GingerAle

avatar
Nombre de usuarioGingerAle
Puntuación2234
Membership
Stats
Preguntas 4
Respuestas 740

 #2
avatar+2234 
+2

Solution (using a mathematical construction):

 

The prime factors of 3240=233451Assemble the primes as multiples of three (3), and count each construction. For 3240: There can be (0, 1, 2, or 3) twos (2) in the construction of a divisor.  So there are a total of four (4) ways to use a two (2) –one of the ways is to not use it.  There can be (1, 2, 3 or 4) threes (3) in the construction of a divisor. Note that for a number to be a multiple of three (3), the number must have at least one multiple of three (3) - that is, there cannot be a zero (0) number of threes (3). So there are a total of four (4) ways to use a three (3).  There can be (0 or 1) fives (5) in the construction of a divisor.  So there are a total of two (2) ways to use a five (5) –one of the ways is to not use it. The product of these counts is 442=32 There are 32 divisors of 3240 that are multiples of three (3). 

 

 

 

 

GA

13 nov 2018
 #8
avatar+2234 
+1

Hi Melody,

This guest post isn’t mine.  This is Mr. BB(2). I suppose I could imitate him using a “monkey see, monkey do” method. To make it more natural, I’d need to eat a few pot-laced brownies and chase them with banana daiquiris infused with 1800 imperial minims of over-proof rum. But I usually just stay sober and troll the BB’s typical dumbness. Here, JB trolls this BB by using my proxy: https://web2.0calc.com/questions/dice-help#r2. JB did an excellent job of throwing this BB off the Troll’s bridge.

 

This post is much better than his usual inept, sloppy fare. He actually replies with a coherent and usable formula giving its reference, instead of a general equation with an incoherent narrative of BS describing how he derived his answer.  Mr. BB has referenced this post before, here: https://web2.0calc.com/questions/the-minimum-number#r3 Apparently he has a great affinity for Naus’ generating function leading to a modified Sterling number. 

Nauseated’s presentation is a wonder, for sure!

 

 

GA

 

PS You're welcome smiley

6 nov 2018
 #11
avatar+2234 
+3

Solution:

(Adapted from dialogues with Lancelot Link)

 

Note the “handshake” formula: n(n – 1)/2 = h where (n) is the number of persons and (h) is the number of handshakes. In this question the number of handshakes is depicted by y+(xy)(xy1)2=281| where (x) = number of teams, (y) = number of gymnasts. Using (n) as the product of (xy) gives y+n(n1)2=281Find the largest integer for (n), such that n(n1)2<281(If you want to be lazy, look up OEIS A000217 “Triangular” numbers and count them. Or ...)To “zero” in on the largest integer, choose a few arbitrary values for (n). n=20;n(n1)/2=190n=25;n(n1)/2=300n=24;n(n1)/2=276 This one. y+276=281y=281276y=5

 

 

GA

21 oct 2018