GingerAle

Solution:..

Answer:  

\(\large a=-\dfrac{bc}{c-b}\quad |\quad \:b\ne \:c\)

GA

How do you take a set of numbers you want to add up and show that in Riemann Sum?

^{[First, you may want to review the use of relative pronouns in English composition. See: www. learnmehowtowrightegudder.org]}

^{If you don’t want to do that, you should preface your questions and comments with a bold-face “Ummm...”}

Riemann Sums are used to find the area under a curve.

\(\LARGE \int _a^b \large f(x)dx = \lim _{n \to \infty} \LARGE \sum \limits_{i=0}^{n-1} \large f(x_{i}) \Delta x. \)

Here’s a well-explained introduction for this concept:

Resolution by analysis.  

Based on these data, is it reasonable to conclude that a sell-out crowd is the cause of the team's poor performance at sold-out home games?

No. It‘s not reasonable to make this conclusion. This data indicates a correlation not causation.   

Can you think of another explaination(sic)

A more likely cause for the Thunder’s poorer performance for sold-out home games is the opposing teams are notably superior in game-playing skills. Teams with superior skills tend to draw larger numbers of spectators, and are more likely to have sell-out crowds.

Did random selection or random assignment play any role in the collection of these data?

No. The data is based on the (total) population, not a sample population. There is no randomness in selection or assignment. 

GA

Down voting a guest is a symbolic statement, Tertre.

In this case it’s also a catalytic condiment for a symbolic and hardy, “STFU!”

How many times do you want us to read this goddamn question? 

Speak your piece, or forever STFU!

GA

Does that mean that after I learn how to factor large numbers, I have to give up eating bananas and climbing trees? 

I think it’s better to factor large numbers while sitting in the treetops eating bananas.  Plus, it’s easier to throw banana peels at you ground-dwellers while you speak techno-babble. 

I suspect this rude, careless dumb-dumb intended this equation:

\(\LARGE x^2 - ax + b = 0\\ \)

Geometric solutions for this quadratic form are found by plotting A(0, 1) and B(a, b) and using the midpoint and distance formulas for finding (y) intercepts in circles. This seems consistent with the question.  Examples of these are sometimes included in pre-calculus texts.

Most of this dialogue sounds like cartoon characters speaking techno babble.

-----------------------------------

Lancelot Link Peeled Banana Productions Presents:

Bleep and Blip: All in a Daze Work

Teleplay by GingerAle 

^{Based on original dumbness by select members and guests of Web2.0calc.com}

Shanghai’d Technical Consultant: Alan

Shanghai’d Silent Technical Consultant: Rom

Shanghai’d Post Production Supervisor: Melody

Sponsored by Naus Corp: Quantum Dumbness Detection Systems  

-----------------------------------

We join the universe-saving characters in progress....

Blip: How did you do that? That number is bigger than my pecker...

Bleep: Well, it’s smaller than mine. Anyway, Blip, I used an ultra-sophisticated proprietary algorithm with ternary protocol subzero three (3) and integrand containment post zero (1) metaphase. This commutes the large number, delineating it into a unified matrix, placing the tertiary integers adjacent to each other in the first three (3) natural dimensions.

Blip: Does this index the residuals that exist in subspace? If not, then we will be leaving half our math in another universe. That would be bad!

Bleep: Ahem, yes ...I see your point. I’ll just run the numbers and algorithm through my other ultra-sophisticated computer with advanced proprietary subroutines programmed by a Martian who was educated on Zork Prime. His algorithm can actually divide by zero (0) without blowing up the universe.

Blip: That is impressive! It’s so cool that we can save the universe!

Bleep: Yes, it is. But we must keep it secret.

Blip: Why?

Bleep: Because anyone who knows anything more than the multiplication tables will make fun of us.  It will distract us from our important work.   

[Fade out scene while Blip nods in agreement.]

[Fade in:  Shrine of Organized Stupidity and Perpetual Quantum Dumbness]

I know you lack the intelligence and education to fully understand, but I clearly said as much in the post:

Synth may have the right to speak his piece of dung, ….

How about ………… Fucking off!  You should be really good at it.